Showing posts with label malaysian affairs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label malaysian affairs. Show all posts

Thursday, April 26, 2007

Memo# 25 : iSpy with my lil eye

Something made me squint when I read this..I felt an evil aura
My spider handsome sense were tingling

source:http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39172

Malaysian government sets up Internet spin team

To counter all those Internet lies

By Nick Farrell: Wednesday 25 April 2007, 16:33

MALAYSIA'S INFORMATION ministry is so miffed that people are going on the web and telling porkies about its glorious government that it has hired a team of spinners just to deal with it.

The crack team of spinners will cast an eagle eye on whatever is being said about Malaysia online. If it sees something that the government will not like it will swoop. Deputy Information Minister Chia Kwang Chye said the team will be in and out with a press release in seconds in a bid to tackle what he said was "abuse" of the Internet and online technology.

Chia told the Bernama news agency the spinners will be purely working to disseminate information, explain correct information and counter the misinformation on government policies.

There is currently a bit of a barny going on online, between the Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi and Malaysian bloggers and other Internet users. He says they are spreading slander and gossip, they say he is... not a very good PM. Miffing a Malaysian PM is apparently enough for the entire government to talk about punishment and tighter controls on Internet use in response.

Already two bloggers are also being sued for defamation by the government-linked New Straits Times Press group in an action identified as a government crack-down on freedom of expression.

Fortunately, the new unit will not have the power to arrest bloggers the PR people don't like. There is nothing more evil than a PR who has the power to lock up a reporter who fails to print their press release. Well, other than a reporter who never questions what a company says.



other source:http://www.smh.com.au/news/Technology/Malaysian-govt-to-counter-Internet-lies/2007/04/25/1177459777303.html



Another brilliant jiak pah boh su zo idea from Zamzam a.k.a Information Minister Zainuddin Maidin and ministry of Bu Su Zo lackey Chia Kwang Chye.
This reminded me of a similar incident that happened in Singapore around February


The Straits Times, Feb 3, 2007:
PAP moves to counter criticism of party, Govt in cyberspace
By Li Xueying
THE People's Action Party (PAP) is mounting a quiet counter-insurgency against its online critics.

It has members going into Internet forums and blogs to rebut anti-establishment views and putting up postings anonymously.

Sources told The Straits Times the initiative is driven by two sub-committees of the PAP's 'new media' committee chaired by Manpower Minister Ng Eng Hen.

One sub-committee, co-headed by Minister of State (Education) Lui Tuck Yew and Hong Kah GRC MP Zaqy Mohamad, strategises the campaign.

The other is led by Tanjong Pagar GRC MP Baey Yam Keng and Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC MP Josephine Teo. Called the 'new media capabilities group', it executes the strategies.

Both were set up after last year's General Election. Aside from politicians, some 20 IT-savvy party activists are also involved.

When contacted, Mr Baey declined to give details of the group's activities, but he outlined the broad principles of the initiative.

It was necessary for the PAP to have a voice in cyberspace as there were few in the online community who were pro-establishment, he said.

As such, the committees aim to 'observe how new media is developing and see how we can use the new media as part of the overall media landscape', he added.

'How do we facilitate views that are pro-party and propagate them through the Internet?'

The approach reflects comments by Rear-Admiral (NS) Lui at the PAP's party conference in December. He called on younger activists to put up views 'to moderate the vitriol and balance the skewed comments' on the Internet.

But this can only work if activists are not 'too obvious' about it, Mr Baey said yesterday. Otherwise it comes across as 'propaganda'.

'The identity is not important. It is the message that is important,' he added.

One activist who is involved said that when posting comments on online forums and the feedback boxes of blogs, he does not identify himself as a PAP member.

He tracks popular blogs and forums to 'see if there is anything we can clarify' on hot-button topics such as the impending hike in the Goods and Services Tax.

But he added: 'We don't rebut everything. Sometimes, what is said is fair enough, and we send the feedback on to the committee.'

This latest initiative comes on top of a blog site with posts by 12 MPs born after Singapore's Independence in 1965.

It recognises that more younger Singaporeans are relying on the new media as a main source of information.

An Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) study conducted last year found that younger and better-educated Singaporeans relied on information from the Internet when shaping their voting choices at the last GE.

Among the opposition parties, members and supporters of the Workers' Party, in particular, post regularly on forums online.

But IPS senior research fellow Tan Tarn How wonders about the effectiveness of the PAP's campaign.

He said Internet users who post on forums such as Sammyboy tend not to be interested in 'intellectual debate' and so will not be persuaded by PAP activists anyway.

As for more serious-minded bloggers, he said the views that the activists may put out are already available in the mainstream media.

Source: Straights Time

I see a trend here. The Establishments are sending out their spies to check up on forums and blogs to counter criticism of the government. Now why didn't THEY think of this in the 80' ?
Of course back then the internet wasn't established yet and blogs were but a thing of the future. But people still used to gossip and slander in local kopitiams while playing Chinese Chess in the jalan kaki 5.

If they had used a similar strategy back then, old Ah-Peks who were spying for the government would have went to the pasar..sat down and played Chinese Chess with the neighbourhood ah-peks to get the low down on the real feelings of the constituents while mailing their (remember back then there were no handphones) feedbacks to their masters.

But this begs the question: Who funds these spinners?
I know it won't be them. They are too selfish to take money out from their own pockets..so most probably it would come from taxes...what?..no you say?..they work for free?? no malaysian would work for free..that's a fact.
Look at the Mat Rempits..they proposed to pay them RM50 for each snatch-thief they catch..but the ironic thing is they ARE the snatch thieves.
Sorry..back to my point

The style varies distinctively between Malaysia and Singapore:

Malaysia
  • the team will be in and out with a press release in seconds in a bid to tackle what he said was "abuse" of the Internet and online technology
Singapore
  • It has members going into Internet forums and blogs to rebut anti-establishment views and putting up postings anonymously.
We, Malaysians would broadcast the government views through our pro-government media:RTM while Singaporeans would discreetly post up rebuttals online making for productive debate on dealing with the problem.

Malaysians are more headstrong when it comes to this issue. Some "official" would most probably wave his keris,say unemployed women are to blame for this and communist are behind this.

Ah ha..there's simple logic behind these disappointed feelings that the people are currently feeling that high end officials can't seem to figure out.
Don't disappointment stem from failure?

so :
Premise A
  • The people are not happy
Premise B
  • The people complain and criticize
Conclusion = government doing bad job

I'm just a kid and I can see that =.="
Fools who waste taxpayers money in parliament debating about pointless stuff like women's attire and AF bringing no moral value to the nation brings indiscriminate waste of resource.

Friday, April 13, 2007

Memo# 20 : Cheap and Cheerful Cars

I saw this video about 2 years ago on DVD around December at my cousin's house. It was entitled "Jeremy Clarkson's Heaven and Hell". It talked about the best cars of the year and also the worst cars of the year.

Not surprisingly, The Perodua Kelisa made it into one of the world's worst manufactured cars. At first all I thought was him ranting out his disappointment at the piece of junk... and then it got real funny. He hung the car a few metres into the air suspending a tonne of weight and later exploding the car with dynamite sticks doing it the Clarkson way.

But sadly, i have already come to terms with reality and give in to the fact that my first car would be a Kelisa and NOT a Mercedes Brabus . What a sad day is it when the hopes and dreams of a little boy is crushed by cruel reality. O how cruel thou art on me! For shame! tsk tsk tsk


Top Gear host Jeremy Clarkson has come under attack in the Malaysian parliament for labelling one of the country's cars the worst in the world.

The BBC presenter has been filmed attacking the Perodua Kelisa with a sledgehammer before blowing it up.

But minister Abdul Raman Suliman defended the nation's car industry, saying Mr Clarkson was like a football commentator who cannot play football.

Perodua had not received a single complaint from UK owners, he told MPs.

He added that the comments were made merely to boost sales of the Top Gear magazine.

'Soulless'

Mr Clarkson has voiced his frustrations with the small three-cylinder model in both magazine articles and on film.

In one article, he said its name was like a disease and suggested it was built in jungles by people who wear leaves for shoes.

And in a DVD car review, he described it as "unimaginative junk, with no soul, no flair and no passion".

He then smashed it, hung it from a crane with a one-tonne weight attached, before blowing it up.

Perodua is Malaysia's second national carmaker and began producing small compact models in 1995.


link: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6528087.stm

Here's the video


Recently Top Gear commented on the Proton Savvy. They weren't even interested in it.



I wonder what would Abdul Raman Suliman say to Jeremy Clarkson if they met.

let's just assume Abdul Raman Suliman is brought up in a chinese school.

Abdul Raman Suliman: Ah neh! Hey you stupid fler! Why u call our national car junk a?
Jeremy Clarkson: May I ask what country are you from?
Abdul Raman Suliman:Malaysia lar! Cibai lu .. tok bad bout the Kelisa..you jeles only bah!
Jeremy Clarkson: *snickers* You call that a decent car? Cars made in 1950 has more life.
Abdul Raman Suliman:You like a football commentator who cannot play football!!!
Jeremy Clarkson: Well Perodua is a car buyer who can't make cars.
Abdul Raman Suliman: *zha dao* li lao bu nehr teach manners ah! I never receive any complaint from UK buyers yet lerr
Jeremy Clarkson: That's because most of them are Malaysians and it's cheap . *mumbles* not in just the price but also in quality
Abdul Raman Suliman: What you say just now ar?
Jeremy Clarkson: Nothing
Abdul Raman Suliman: You blow up our car just for ratings only. Cheap publicity stunt wan.
Jeremy Clarkson: Of course it was. But I wouldnt blow up a BMW M5 would I? You know why? Because the Kelisa is crap. Pure soulless crap XD
Abdul Raman Suliman: Aiya you angmoh all have money larr.. can buy wat wat BMW M16 and fancy fancy interior.. MCH!!
Jeremy Clarkson:At least the Satria GTI was better.

*end of conversation*